Atmos FundedvsBlue Guardian

The headline difference is profit split — Atmos Funded offers 80% while Blue Guardian offers 85%. Beyond that, Atmos Funded charges $379 with a max allocation of $600,000, compared to Blue Guardian's $463 and $400,000.

Atmos Funded's challenge fee of $379 is lower than Blue Guardian's $463, making it the lower-cost option for traders focused on upfront fees.

Blue Guardian offers a 85% profit split, compared with Atmos Funded's 80%. The 5 percentage point difference can become meaningful as trading profits increase.

Atmos Funded offers a maximum allocation of $600,000, compared with Blue Guardian's $400,000. Traders looking to manage larger amounts of capital may prefer Atmos Funded.

Both firms use a 2-step evaluation. Atmos Funded requires 3 minimum trading days per phase, while Blue Guardian requires 4. Atmos Funded provides greater scheduling flexibility.

Both Atmos Funded and Blue Guardian use Balance Equity Highest Eod drawdown rules, so there is no difference in how your loss limit is calculated.

Atmos Funded pays out every 1 days, while Blue Guardian pays out every 14 days.

Atmos Funded offers more frequent access to profits, which may appeal to traders who prioritize regular cash flow.

Both Atmos Funded and Blue Guardian offer a scaling plan, allowing funded traders to increase their account allocation over time by meeting performance targets.

Atmos Funded leads on both rating (4.2) and review volume (6), making it the stronger customer satisfaction signal. Blue Guardian has a 1 rating from 1 reviews.