Atmos FundedvsBlueberry Funded

Atmos Funded and Blueberry Funded both offer a 80% profit split, so the real differentiators come down to cost, capital, and rules. Atmos Funded charges $379 and funds up to $600,000, while Blueberry Funded charges $650 and funds up to $400,000. Atmos Funded uses a 2-step evaluation; Blueberry Funded uses 2 steps.

Atmos Funded's challenge fee of $379 is lower than Blueberry Funded's $650, making it the lower-cost option for traders focused on upfront fees.

Both Atmos Funded and Blueberry Funded offer a 80% profit split, so there is no meaningful difference in how profits are shared. Other factors—such as payout frequency, scaling plans, and maximum allocation—are likely to have a greater impact on your decision.

Atmos Funded offers a maximum allocation of $600,000, compared with Blueberry Funded's $400,000. Traders looking to manage larger amounts of capital may prefer Atmos Funded.

Both firms use a 2-step evaluation. Atmos Funded requires 3 minimum trading days per phase, while Blueberry Funded requires 5. Atmos Funded provides greater scheduling flexibility.

Both Atmos Funded and Blueberry Funded use Balance Equity Highest Eod drawdown rules, so there is no difference in how your loss limit is calculated.

Atmos Funded pays out every 1 days, while Blueberry Funded pays out every 14 days.

Atmos Funded offers more frequent access to profits, which may appeal to traders who prioritize regular cash flow.

Atmos Funded offers a scaling plan, while Blueberry Funded does not. If increasing your funded capital over time is important, Atmos Funded has an advantage.

Blueberry Funded holds a 5 rating from 4 reviews, while Atmos Funded holds a 4.2 rating from 6 reviews. Blueberry Funded scores higher, but Atmos Funded's rating is based on a larger sample size, so both factors are worth considering.