Audacity CapitalvsAtmos Funded

The headline difference is profit split — Atmos Funded offers 80% while Audacity Capital offers 75%. Beyond that, Atmos Funded charges $379 with a max allocation of $600,000, compared to Audacity Capital's $549 and $600,000.

Atmos Funded's challenge fee of $379 is lower than Audacity Capital's $549, making it the lower-cost option for traders focused on upfront fees.

Atmos Funded offers a 80% profit split, compared with Audacity Capital's 75%. The 5 percentage point difference can become meaningful as trading profits increase.

Both Atmos Funded and Audacity Capital offer a maximum allocation of $600,000. Other factors—such as scaling plans, payout frequency, and evaluation rules—are likely to have a greater impact on your decision.

Both firms use a 2-step evaluation. Atmos Funded requires 3 minimum trading days per phase, while Audacity Capital requires 4. Atmos Funded provides greater scheduling flexibility.

Both Atmos Funded and Audacity Capital use Balance Equity Highest Eod drawdown rules, so there is no difference in how your loss limit is calculated.

Atmos Funded pays out every 1 days, while Audacity Capital pays out every 14 days.

Atmos Funded offers more frequent access to profits, which may appeal to traders who prioritize regular cash flow.

Both Atmos Funded and Audacity Capital offer a scaling plan, allowing funded traders to increase their account allocation over time by meeting performance targets.

Audacity Capital leads on both rating (4.7) and review volume (9), making it the stronger customer satisfaction signal. Atmos Funded has a 4.2 rating from 6 reviews.