Audacity CapitalvsFTMO

The headline difference is profit split — Audacity Capital offers 75% while FTMO offers 80%. Beyond that, Audacity Capital charges $549 with a max allocation of $600,000, compared to FTMO's $540 and $400,000.

FTMO's challenge fee of $540 is lower than Audacity Capital's $549, making it the lower-cost option for traders focused on upfront fees.

FTMO offers a 80% profit split, compared with Audacity Capital's 75%. The 5 percentage point difference can become meaningful as trading profits increase.

Audacity Capital offers a maximum allocation of $600,000, compared with FTMO's $400,000. Traders looking to manage larger amounts of capital may prefer Audacity Capital.

Both Audacity Capital and FTMO use a 2-step evaluation with a 4-day minimum per phase, so neither offers a faster evaluation timeline.

Audacity Capital uses Balance Equity Highest Eod drawdown, while FTMO uses Balance Based.

Audacity Capital pays out every 14 days, while FTMO pays out every 14 days.

Both firms have the same payout frequency, so there is no meaningful difference in how often you can request payouts.

Both Audacity Capital and FTMO offer a scaling plan, allowing funded traders to increase their account allocation over time by meeting performance targets.

Audacity Capital leads on both rating (4.7) and review volume (9), making it the stronger customer satisfaction signal. FTMO has a 3.4 rating from 7 reviews.