Audacity CapitalvsLark Funding

The headline difference is profit split — Audacity Capital offers 75% while Lark Funding offers 80%. Beyond that, Audacity Capital charges $699 with a max allocation of $600,000, compared to Lark Funding's $800 and $300,000.

Audacity Capital's challenge fee of $699 is lower than Lark Funding's $800, making it the lower-cost option for traders focused on upfront fees.

Lark Funding offers a 80% profit split, compared with Audacity Capital's 75%. The 5 percentage point difference can become meaningful as trading profits increase.

Audacity Capital offers a maximum allocation of $600,000, compared with Lark Funding's $300,000. Traders looking to manage larger amounts of capital may prefer Audacity Capital.

Both firms use a 1-step evaluation. Audacity Capital requires at least 3 trading days per phase, while Lark Funding has no minimum trading day requirement, allowing faster progression if performance targets are met.

Audacity Capital uses Balance Equity Highest Eod drawdown, while Lark Funding uses Balance Based.

Audacity Capital pays out every 14 days, while Lark Funding pays out every 14 days.

Both firms have the same payout frequency, so there is no meaningful difference in how often you can request payouts.

Audacity Capital offers a scaling plan, while Lark Funding does not. If increasing your funded capital over time is important, Audacity Capital has an advantage.

Audacity Capital holds a 4.7 rating from 9 reviews, while Lark Funding holds a 4.6 rating from 10 reviews. Audacity Capital scores higher, but Lark Funding's rating is based on a larger sample size, so both factors are worth considering.