Audacity CapitalvsWSFunded

The headline difference is profit split — Audacity Capital offers 75% while WSFunded offers 80%. Beyond that, Audacity Capital charges $549 with a max allocation of $600,000, compared to WSFunded's $529 and $400,000.

WSFunded's challenge fee of $529 is lower than Audacity Capital's $549, making it the lower-cost option for traders focused on upfront fees.

WSFunded offers a 80% profit split, compared with Audacity Capital's 75%. The 5 percentage point difference can become meaningful as trading profits increase.

Audacity Capital offers a maximum allocation of $600,000, compared with WSFunded's $400,000. Traders looking to manage larger amounts of capital may prefer Audacity Capital.

Both Audacity Capital and WSFunded use a 2-step evaluation with a 4-day minimum per phase, so neither offers a faster evaluation timeline.

Both Audacity Capital and WSFunded use Balance Equity Highest Eod drawdown rules, so there is no difference in how your loss limit is calculated.

Audacity Capital pays out every 14 days, while WSFunded pays out every 10 days.

WSFunded offers more frequent access to profits, which may appeal to traders who prioritize regular cash flow.

Both Audacity Capital and WSFunded offer a scaling plan, allowing funded traders to increase their account allocation over time by meeting performance targets.

Audacity Capital leads on both rating (4.7) and review volume (9), making it the stronger customer satisfaction signal. WSFunded has a 4.1 rating from 8 reviews.