BEM FundingvsAquaFunded

The headline difference is profit split — AquaFunded offers 90% while BEM Funding offers 80%. Beyond that, AquaFunded charges $429 with a max allocation of $400,000, compared to BEM Funding's $519 and $200,000.

AquaFunded's challenge fee of $429 is lower than BEM Funding's $519, making it the lower-cost option for traders focused on upfront fees.

AquaFunded offers a 90% profit split, compared with BEM Funding's 80%. The 10 percentage point difference can become meaningful as trading profits increase.

AquaFunded offers a maximum allocation of $400,000, compared with BEM Funding's $200,000. Traders looking to manage larger amounts of capital may prefer AquaFunded.

Both firms use a 2-step evaluation. BEM Funding requires at least 3 trading days per phase, while AquaFunded has no minimum trading day requirement, allowing faster progression if performance targets are met.

Both AquaFunded and BEM Funding use Balance Equity Highest Eod drawdown rules, so there is no difference in how your loss limit is calculated.

AquaFunded pays out every 14 days, while BEM Funding pays out every 14 days.

Both firms have the same payout frequency, so there is no meaningful difference in how often you can request payouts.

AquaFunded offers a scaling plan, while BEM Funding does not. If increasing your funded capital over time is important, AquaFunded has an advantage.

BEM Funding leads on both rating (5) and review volume (7), making it the stronger customer satisfaction signal. AquaFunded has a 3.3 rating from 3 reviews.