BEM FundingvsAudacity Capital

The headline difference is profit split — Audacity Capital offers 75% while BEM Funding offers 80%. Beyond that, Audacity Capital charges $549 with a max allocation of $600,000, compared to BEM Funding's $519 and $200,000.

BEM Funding's challenge fee of $519 is lower than Audacity Capital's $549, making it the lower-cost option for traders focused on upfront fees.

BEM Funding offers a 80% profit split, compared with Audacity Capital's 75%. The 5 percentage point difference can become meaningful as trading profits increase.

Audacity Capital offers a maximum allocation of $600,000, compared with BEM Funding's $200,000. Traders looking to manage larger amounts of capital may prefer Audacity Capital.

Both firms use a 2-step evaluation. Audacity Capital requires 4 minimum trading days per phase, while BEM Funding requires 3. BEM Funding provides greater scheduling flexibility.

Both Audacity Capital and BEM Funding use Balance Equity Highest Eod drawdown rules, so there is no difference in how your loss limit is calculated.

Audacity Capital pays out every 14 days, while BEM Funding pays out every 14 days.

Both firms have the same payout frequency, so there is no meaningful difference in how often you can request payouts.

Audacity Capital offers a scaling plan, while BEM Funding does not. If increasing your funded capital over time is important, Audacity Capital has an advantage.

BEM Funding holds a 5 rating from 7 reviews, while Audacity Capital holds a 4.7 rating from 9 reviews. BEM Funding scores higher, but Audacity Capital's rating is based on a larger sample size, so both factors are worth considering.