BEM FundingvsBlueberry Funded

BEM Funding and Blueberry Funded both offer a 80% profit split, so the real differentiators come down to cost, capital, and rules. BEM Funding charges $519 and funds up to $200,000, while Blueberry Funded charges $650 and funds up to $400,000. BEM Funding uses a 2-step evaluation; Blueberry Funded uses 2 steps.

BEM Funding's challenge fee of $519 is lower than Blueberry Funded's $650, making it the lower-cost option for traders focused on upfront fees.

Both BEM Funding and Blueberry Funded offer a 80% profit split, so there is no meaningful difference in how profits are shared. Other factors—such as payout frequency, scaling plans, and maximum allocation—are likely to have a greater impact on your decision.

Blueberry Funded offers a maximum allocation of $400,000, compared with BEM Funding's $200,000. Traders looking to manage larger amounts of capital may prefer Blueberry Funded.

Both firms use a 2-step evaluation. BEM Funding requires 3 minimum trading days per phase, while Blueberry Funded requires 5. BEM Funding provides greater scheduling flexibility.

Both BEM Funding and Blueberry Funded use Balance Equity Highest Eod drawdown rules, so there is no difference in how your loss limit is calculated.

BEM Funding pays out every 14 days, while Blueberry Funded pays out every 14 days.

Both firms have the same payout frequency, so there is no meaningful difference in how often you can request payouts.

Neither BEM Funding nor Blueberry Funded currently offers a scaling plan. Maximum allocations remain fixed at $200,000 and $400,000, respectively.

Both BEM Funding and Blueberry Funded have a 5 rating on PFM. With identical scores, BEM Funding has more reviews, giving its rating greater statistical confidence.