BEM FundingvsLark Funding

BEM Funding and Lark Funding both offer a 80% profit split, so the real differentiators come down to cost, capital, and rules. BEM Funding charges $460 and funds up to $200,000, while Lark Funding charges $800 and funds up to $300,000. BEM Funding uses a 1-step evaluation; Lark Funding uses 1 steps.

BEM Funding's challenge fee of $460 is lower than Lark Funding's $800, making it the lower-cost option for traders focused on upfront fees.

Both BEM Funding and Lark Funding offer a 80% profit split, so there is no meaningful difference in how profits are shared. Other factors—such as payout frequency, scaling plans, and maximum allocation—are likely to have a greater impact on your decision.

Lark Funding offers a maximum allocation of $300,000, compared with BEM Funding's $200,000. Traders looking to manage larger amounts of capital may prefer Lark Funding.

Neither BEM Funding nor Lark Funding has a minimum trading day requirement. Since both also use a 1-step evaluation, their evaluation timelines are effectively the same.

Both BEM Funding and Lark Funding use Balance Based drawdown rules, so there is no difference in how your loss limit is calculated.

BEM Funding pays out every 1 days, while Lark Funding pays out every 14 days.

BEM Funding offers more frequent access to profits, which may appeal to traders who prioritize regular cash flow.

Neither BEM Funding nor Lark Funding currently offers a scaling plan. Maximum allocations remain fixed at $200,000 and $300,000, respectively.

BEM Funding holds a 5 rating from 7 reviews, while Lark Funding holds a 4.6 rating from 10 reviews. BEM Funding scores higher, but Lark Funding's rating is based on a larger sample size, so both factors are worth considering.