Blueberry FundedvsWSFunded

Blueberry Funded and WSFunded both offer a 80% profit split, so the real differentiators come down to cost, capital, and rules. Blueberry Funded charges $650 and funds up to $400,000, while WSFunded charges $529 and funds up to $400,000. Blueberry Funded uses a 2-step evaluation; WSFunded uses 2 steps.

WSFunded's challenge fee of $529 is lower than Blueberry Funded's $650, making it the lower-cost option for traders focused on upfront fees.

Both Blueberry Funded and WSFunded offer a 80% profit split, so there is no meaningful difference in how profits are shared. Other factors—such as payout frequency, scaling plans, and maximum allocation—are likely to have a greater impact on your decision.

Both Blueberry Funded and WSFunded offer a maximum allocation of $400,000. Other factors—such as scaling plans, payout frequency, and evaluation rules—are likely to have a greater impact on your decision.

Both firms use a 2-step evaluation. Blueberry Funded requires 5 minimum trading days per phase, while WSFunded requires 4. WSFunded provides greater scheduling flexibility.

Both Blueberry Funded and WSFunded use Balance Equity Highest Eod drawdown rules, so there is no difference in how your loss limit is calculated.

Blueberry Funded pays out every 14 days, while WSFunded pays out every 10 days.

WSFunded offers more frequent access to profits, which may appeal to traders who prioritize regular cash flow.

WSFunded offers a scaling plan, while Blueberry Funded does not. If increasing your funded capital over time is important, WSFunded has an advantage.

Blueberry Funded holds a 5 rating from 4 reviews, while WSFunded holds a 4.1 rating from 8 reviews. Blueberry Funded scores higher, but WSFunded's rating is based on a larger sample size, so both factors are worth considering.