FintokeivsWSFunded

Fintokei and WSFunded both offer a 80% profit split, so the real differentiators come down to cost, capital, and rules. Fintokei charges $529 and funds up to $700,000, while WSFunded charges $529 and funds up to $400,000. Fintokei uses a 2-step evaluation; WSFunded uses 2 steps.

Both Fintokei and WSFunded charge the same challenge fee of $529. With identical upfront costs, other factors such as allocation size, evaluation rules, and payout terms become more important.

Both Fintokei and WSFunded offer a 80% profit split, so there is no meaningful difference in how profits are shared. Other factors—such as payout frequency, scaling plans, and maximum allocation—are likely to have a greater impact on your decision.

Fintokei offers a maximum allocation of $700,000, compared with WSFunded's $400,000. Traders looking to manage larger amounts of capital may prefer Fintokei.

Both firms use a 2-step evaluation. Fintokei requires 3 minimum trading days per phase, while WSFunded requires 4. Fintokei provides greater scheduling flexibility.

Fintokei uses Equity Based drawdown, while WSFunded uses Balance Equity Highest Eod.

Fintokei pays out every 14 days, while WSFunded pays out every 10 days.

WSFunded offers more frequent access to profits, which may appeal to traders who prioritize regular cash flow.

Both Fintokei and WSFunded offer a scaling plan, allowing funded traders to increase their account allocation over time by meeting performance targets.

Fintokei holds a 4.7 rating from 7 reviews, while WSFunded holds a 4.1 rating from 8 reviews. Fintokei scores higher, but WSFunded's rating is based on a larger sample size, so both factors are worth considering.