FTMOvsBlueberry Funded

Blueberry Funded and FTMO both offer a 80% profit split, so the real differentiators come down to cost, capital, and rules. Blueberry Funded charges $650 and funds up to $400,000, while FTMO charges $540 and funds up to $400,000. Blueberry Funded uses a 2-step evaluation; FTMO uses 2 steps.

FTMO's challenge fee of $540 is lower than Blueberry Funded's $650, making it the lower-cost option for traders focused on upfront fees.

Both Blueberry Funded and FTMO offer a 80% profit split, so there is no meaningful difference in how profits are shared. Other factors—such as payout frequency, scaling plans, and maximum allocation—are likely to have a greater impact on your decision.

Both Blueberry Funded and FTMO offer a maximum allocation of $400,000. Other factors—such as scaling plans, payout frequency, and evaluation rules—are likely to have a greater impact on your decision.

Both firms use a 2-step evaluation. Blueberry Funded requires 5 minimum trading days per phase, while FTMO requires 4. FTMO provides greater scheduling flexibility.

Blueberry Funded uses Balance Equity Highest Eod drawdown, while FTMO uses Balance Based.

Blueberry Funded pays out every 14 days, while FTMO pays out every 14 days.

Both firms have the same payout frequency, so there is no meaningful difference in how often you can request payouts.

FTMO offers a scaling plan, while Blueberry Funded does not. If increasing your funded capital over time is important, FTMO has an advantage.

Blueberry Funded holds a 5 rating from 4 reviews, while FTMO holds a 3.4 rating from 7 reviews. Blueberry Funded scores higher, but FTMO's rating is based on a larger sample size, so both factors are worth considering.