FTMOvsOrion Funded

FTMO and Orion Funded both offer a 80% profit split, so the real differentiators come down to cost, capital, and rules. FTMO charges $250 and funds up to $400,000, while Orion Funded charges $179 and funds up to $400,000. FTMO uses a 2-step evaluation; Orion Funded uses 2 steps.

Orion Funded's challenge fee of $179 is lower than FTMO's $250, making it the lower-cost option for traders focused on upfront fees.

Both FTMO and Orion Funded offer a 80% profit split, so there is no meaningful difference in how profits are shared. Other factors—such as payout frequency, scaling plans, and maximum allocation—are likely to have a greater impact on your decision.

Both FTMO and Orion Funded offer a maximum allocation of $400,000. Other factors—such as scaling plans, payout frequency, and evaluation rules—are likely to have a greater impact on your decision.

Both FTMO and Orion Funded use a 2-step evaluation with a 4-day minimum per phase, so neither offers a faster evaluation timeline.

FTMO uses Balance Based drawdown, while Orion Funded uses Balance Equity Highest Eod.

FTMO pays out every 14 days, while Orion Funded pays out every 14 days.

Both firms have the same payout frequency, so there is no meaningful difference in how often you can request payouts.

Both FTMO and Orion Funded offer a scaling plan, allowing funded traders to increase their account allocation over time by meeting performance targets.

Orion Funded leads on both rating (4.1) and review volume (10), making it the stronger customer satisfaction signal. FTMO has a 3.4 rating from 7 reviews.