Funded Trading PlusvsBlueberry Funded

Blueberry Funded and Funded Trading Plus both offer a 80% profit split, so the real differentiators come down to cost, capital, and rules. Blueberry Funded charges $650 and funds up to $400,000, while Funded Trading Plus charges $549 and funds up to $2,500,000. Blueberry Funded uses a 2-step evaluation; Funded Trading Plus uses 2 steps.

Funded Trading Plus's challenge fee of $549 is lower than Blueberry Funded's $650, making it the lower-cost option for traders focused on upfront fees.

Both Blueberry Funded and Funded Trading Plus offer a 80% profit split, so there is no meaningful difference in how profits are shared. Other factors—such as payout frequency, scaling plans, and maximum allocation—are likely to have a greater impact on your decision.

Funded Trading Plus offers a maximum allocation of $2,500,000, compared with Blueberry Funded's $400,000. Traders looking to manage larger amounts of capital may prefer Funded Trading Plus.

Both firms use a 2-step evaluation. Blueberry Funded requires at least 5 trading days per phase, while Funded Trading Plus has no minimum trading day requirement, allowing faster progression if performance targets are met.

Blueberry Funded uses Balance Equity Highest Eod drawdown, while Funded Trading Plus uses Balance Based.

Blueberry Funded pays out every 14 days, while Funded Trading Plus pays out every 10 days.

Funded Trading Plus offers more frequent access to profits, which may appeal to traders who prioritize regular cash flow.

Funded Trading Plus offers a scaling plan, while Blueberry Funded does not. If increasing your funded capital over time is important, Funded Trading Plus has an advantage.

Both Blueberry Funded and Funded Trading Plus have a 5 rating on PFM. With identical scores, Funded Trading Plus has more reviews, giving its rating greater statistical confidence.