Funded Trading PlusvsFundingPips

Funded Trading Plus and FundingPips both offer a 80% profit split, so the real differentiators come down to cost, capital, and rules. Funded Trading Plus charges $549 and funds up to $2,500,000, while FundingPips charges $422 and funds up to $400,000. Funded Trading Plus uses a 2-step evaluation; FundingPips uses 2 steps.

FundingPips's challenge fee of $422 is lower than Funded Trading Plus's $549, making it the lower-cost option for traders focused on upfront fees.

Both Funded Trading Plus and FundingPips offer a 80% profit split, so there is no meaningful difference in how profits are shared. Other factors—such as payout frequency, scaling plans, and maximum allocation—are likely to have a greater impact on your decision.

Funded Trading Plus offers a maximum allocation of $2,500,000, compared with FundingPips's $400,000. Traders looking to manage larger amounts of capital may prefer Funded Trading Plus.

Both firms use a 2-step evaluation. FundingPips requires at least 1 trading days per phase, while Funded Trading Plus has no minimum trading day requirement, allowing faster progression if performance targets are met.

Funded Trading Plus uses Balance Based drawdown, while FundingPips uses Balance Equity Highest Eod.

Funded Trading Plus pays out every 10 days, while FundingPips pays out every 7 days.

FundingPips offers more frequent access to profits, which may appeal to traders who prioritize regular cash flow.

Both Funded Trading Plus and FundingPips offer a scaling plan, allowing funded traders to increase their account allocation over time by meeting performance targets.

Funded Trading Plus holds a 5 rating from 8 reviews, while FundingPips holds a 3 rating from 10 reviews. Funded Trading Plus scores higher, but FundingPips's rating is based on a larger sample size, so both factors are worth considering.