FundedNextvsFTMO

FTMO and FundedNext both offer a 80% profit split, so the real differentiators come down to cost, capital, and rules. FTMO charges $540 and funds up to $400,000, while FundedNext charges $400 and funds up to $300,000. FTMO uses a 2-step evaluation; FundedNext uses 2 steps.

FundedNext's challenge fee of $400 is lower than FTMO's $540, making it the lower-cost option for traders focused on upfront fees.

Both FTMO and FundedNext offer a 80% profit split, so there is no meaningful difference in how profits are shared. Other factors—such as payout frequency, scaling plans, and maximum allocation—are likely to have a greater impact on your decision.

FTMO offers a maximum allocation of $400,000, compared with FundedNext's $300,000. Traders looking to manage larger amounts of capital may prefer FTMO.

Both firms use a 2-step evaluation. FTMO requires 4 minimum trading days per phase, while FundedNext requires 5. FTMO provides greater scheduling flexibility.

Both FTMO and FundedNext use Balance Based drawdown rules, so there is no difference in how your loss limit is calculated.

FTMO pays out every 14 days, while FundedNext pays out every 14 days.

Both firms have the same payout frequency, so there is no meaningful difference in how often you can request payouts.

Both FTMO and FundedNext offer a scaling plan, allowing funded traders to increase their account allocation over time by meeting performance targets.

FundedNext leads on both rating (3.8) and review volume (8), making it the stronger customer satisfaction signal. FTMO has a 3.4 rating from 7 reviews.