FundingPipsvsOrion Funded

FundingPips and Orion Funded both offer a 80% profit split, so the real differentiators come down to cost, capital, and rules. FundingPips charges $134 and funds up to $400,000, while Orion Funded charges $179 and funds up to $400,000. FundingPips uses a 2-step evaluation; Orion Funded uses 2 steps.

FundingPips's challenge fee of $134 is lower than Orion Funded's $179, making it the lower-cost option for traders focused on upfront fees.

Both FundingPips and Orion Funded offer a 80% profit split, so there is no meaningful difference in how profits are shared. Other factors—such as payout frequency, scaling plans, and maximum allocation—are likely to have a greater impact on your decision.

Both FundingPips and Orion Funded offer a maximum allocation of $400,000. Other factors—such as scaling plans, payout frequency, and evaluation rules—are likely to have a greater impact on your decision.

Both firms use a 2-step evaluation. FundingPips requires 1 minimum trading days per phase, while Orion Funded requires 4. FundingPips provides greater scheduling flexibility.

Both FundingPips and Orion Funded use Balance Equity Highest Eod drawdown rules, so there is no difference in how your loss limit is calculated.

FundingPips pays out every 7 days, while Orion Funded pays out every 14 days.

FundingPips offers more frequent access to profits, which may appeal to traders who prioritize regular cash flow.

Both FundingPips and Orion Funded offer a scaling plan, allowing funded traders to increase their account allocation over time by meeting performance targets.

Orion Funded leads on both rating (4.1) and review volume (10), making it the stronger customer satisfaction signal. FundingPips has a 3 rating from 10 reviews.