Hantec TradervsFundingPips

FundingPips and Hantec Trader both offer a 80% profit split, so the real differentiators come down to cost, capital, and rules. FundingPips charges $422 and funds up to $400,000, while Hantec Trader charges $499 and funds up to $400,000. FundingPips uses a 2-step evaluation; Hantec Trader uses 2 steps.

FundingPips's challenge fee of $422 is lower than Hantec Trader's $499, making it the lower-cost option for traders focused on upfront fees.

Both FundingPips and Hantec Trader offer a 80% profit split, so there is no meaningful difference in how profits are shared. Other factors—such as payout frequency, scaling plans, and maximum allocation—are likely to have a greater impact on your decision.

Both FundingPips and Hantec Trader offer a maximum allocation of $400,000. Other factors—such as scaling plans, payout frequency, and evaluation rules—are likely to have a greater impact on your decision.

Both firms use a 2-step evaluation. FundingPips requires at least 1 trading days per phase, while Hantec Trader has no minimum trading day requirement, allowing faster progression if performance targets are met.

Both FundingPips and Hantec Trader use Balance Equity Highest Eod drawdown rules, so there is no difference in how your loss limit is calculated.

FundingPips pays out every 7 days, while Hantec Trader pays out every 14 days.

FundingPips offers more frequent access to profits, which may appeal to traders who prioritize regular cash flow.

Both FundingPips and Hantec Trader offer a scaling plan, allowing funded traders to increase their account allocation over time by meeting performance targets.

Hantec Trader leads on both rating (3.3) and review volume (15), making it the stronger customer satisfaction signal. FundingPips has a 3 rating from 10 reviews.