Lark FundingvsBlue Guardian

The headline difference is profit split — Blue Guardian offers 85% while Lark Funding offers 80%. Beyond that, Blue Guardian charges $497 with a max allocation of $400,000, compared to Lark Funding's $800 and $300,000.

Blue Guardian's challenge fee of $497 is lower than Lark Funding's $800, making it the lower-cost option for traders focused on upfront fees.

Blue Guardian offers a 85% profit split, compared with Lark Funding's 80%. The 5 percentage point difference can become meaningful as trading profits increase.

Blue Guardian offers a maximum allocation of $400,000, compared with Lark Funding's $300,000. Traders looking to manage larger amounts of capital may prefer Blue Guardian.

Both firms use a 1-step evaluation. Blue Guardian requires at least 3 trading days per phase, while Lark Funding has no minimum trading day requirement, allowing faster progression if performance targets are met.

Blue Guardian uses Balance Equity Highest Eod drawdown, while Lark Funding uses Balance Based.

Blue Guardian pays out every 14 days, while Lark Funding pays out every 14 days.

Both firms have the same payout frequency, so there is no meaningful difference in how often you can request payouts.

Blue Guardian offers a scaling plan, while Lark Funding does not. If increasing your funded capital over time is important, Blue Guardian has an advantage.

Lark Funding leads on both rating (4.6) and review volume (10), making it the stronger customer satisfaction signal. Blue Guardian has a 1 rating from 1 reviews.