WSFundedvsBlue Guardian

The headline difference is profit split — Blue Guardian offers 85% while WSFunded offers 80%. Beyond that, Blue Guardian charges $463 with a max allocation of $400,000, compared to WSFunded's $529 and $400,000.

Blue Guardian's challenge fee of $463 is lower than WSFunded's $529, making it the lower-cost option for traders focused on upfront fees.

Blue Guardian offers a 85% profit split, compared with WSFunded's 80%. The 5 percentage point difference can become meaningful as trading profits increase.

Both Blue Guardian and WSFunded offer a maximum allocation of $400,000. Other factors—such as scaling plans, payout frequency, and evaluation rules—are likely to have a greater impact on your decision.

Both Blue Guardian and WSFunded use a 2-step evaluation with a 4-day minimum per phase, so neither offers a faster evaluation timeline.

Both Blue Guardian and WSFunded use Balance Equity Highest Eod drawdown rules, so there is no difference in how your loss limit is calculated.

Blue Guardian pays out every 14 days, while WSFunded pays out every 10 days.

WSFunded offers more frequent access to profits, which may appeal to traders who prioritize regular cash flow.

Both Blue Guardian and WSFunded offer a scaling plan, allowing funded traders to increase their account allocation over time by meeting performance targets.

WSFunded leads on both rating (4.1) and review volume (8), making it the stronger customer satisfaction signal. Blue Guardian has a 1 rating from 1 reviews.