New Giveaway Available →Reviews9
Sort by
3.1
4.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$50K
2 Steps
nice prop firm nice platform rules is fine A wide selection of challenges Fair laws Overall experience at fundingpips was great, customer support and user dashboard are top notch, I took a 2 step challenge where the rules were clear.
N/A
0
A selection of challenges, and price
There are few promotions.
4.0
User Friendliness
4.0
Payout Process
4.0
Customer Care
3.0
Trading Conditions
3.1
5.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$100K
Instant
This will going to be my alternative to 5ers since they are encountering various issues and delays right now. Glad that FundingPips has set the bar for a trusted firm
N/A
0
User friendly trading conditions
it took some time for their customer service to respond
5.0
User Friendliness
5.0
Payout Process
5.0
Customer Care
5.0
Trading Conditions
3.1
1.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$25K
1 Step
Extremely disappointing experience with FundingPips. I purchased a 1-Step account on May 10, 2026, intending to use EAs on my own dedicated VPS. After my purchase, FundingPips significantly changed its VPN/VPS rules, and their support gave me contradictory answers about whether a legitimate dedicated VPS was allowed. I was then told the new restrictions also applied to existing accounts. When I requested a refund because these changes directly affected how I intended to use the service, my request was denied. Even worse, shortly after requesting ...
N/A
0
Nothing, trading wasnt that good and dashboard seems was made with ai.
1.0
User Friendliness
1.0
Payout Process
1.0
Customer Care
1.0
Trading Conditions
3.1
3.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$50K
2 Steps
I was a client of this prop firm for about a year, and overall my experience was positive. The spreads were good, order execution was solid, and communication with support was professional. I successfully passed the evaluation and received a $50,000 live account. Recently, however, the firm introduced a new rule for existing two-phase accounts: a maximum of 2% risk per trade. At first glance, this sounds like a good risk management rule. In practice, though, it means that if your loss on a single trade exceeds around 1.2% because of slippage, your ...
3 Months +
0
2
Spreads and service
the firm's new introductions
5.0
User Friendliness
5.0
Payout Process
5.0
Customer Care
1.0
Trading Conditions
3.1
1.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$50K
2 Steps
I am submitting this review/dispute because FundingPips banned my funded Master account for an alleged device ID change/device sharing breach, despite the fact that their support had previously confirmed in writing that my VPS with static IP setup was compliant under their VPS policy exception. The timeline is the main issue. I used the same VPS/static IP setup across Phase 1, Phase 2, and the Master account. Before placing trades on the Master account, I asked FundingPips support about this setup and received written confirmation that it was accep...
Less 1 Month
0
3
The only positive part of the experience was that FundingPips support initially responded to my VPS/static IP question before I traded the Master account. They confirmed in writing that the setup was acceptable under their VPS policy exception, which is why I proceeded using that same setup.
What I liked least was the lack of transparency and the refusal to engage with the timeline. FundingPips banned my funded Master account for an alleged device sharing/device ID issue, but the ban notice came more than a week after my last trade and after a period of zero account activity. Support did not provide logs, screenshots, device details, or a clear explanation of what supposedly triggered the breach. The only answer I received from multiple agents was that the decision was final, even though I had prior written approval for the VPS/static IP setup.
4.0
User Friendliness
2.0
Payout Process
1.0
Customer Care
3.0
Trading Conditions
Reason
Breach Reason
Device ID change / alleged device sharing
Summary
FundingPips stated that my Master account was breached because of a device ID change/device sharing issue. I believe this was unjustified because I used the same VPS with a static IP across Phase 1, Phase 2, and the Master account, and FundingPips support had confirmed in writing before Master account trading that this setup was compliant under their new VPS policy. The timing does not add up. My last trade on the Master account was on 29 June, with 4 trades total. I had no trading activity after that because I was traveling. The ban email arrived on 8 July, more than a week later. FundingPips has not explained how a device sharing breach could have occurred during a period when the account had no trading activity. When I asked for clarification, support did not provide logs, screenshots, device details, linked account information, or any evidence showing what triggered the decision. Multiple agents only repeated that the trading team's decision was final. I offered to provide VPS logs and supporting evidence, but they did not review or engage with that offer. Supporting documents I can upload include: the chat confirming the VPS/static IP setup was approved, the ban email dated 8 July, account/trade history showing the last trade date of 29 June, and follow-up support chats where I asked for an explanation and received only final-decision responses.
Documents From Reporter
3.1
4.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$5K
2 Steps
Overall experience at fundingpips was great, customer support and user dashboard are top notch, I took a 2 step challenge where the rules were clear, and and confusion was sorted really quickly by the support. Looking forward to dealing with fundingpips on the coming days.
N/A
0
Customer Support, User Dashboard were really smooth
Not much to say about the dislikes at fundingpips, one thung can be improved i.e. the spread fluctuations.
5.0
User Friendliness
4.0
Payout Process
5.0
Customer Care
4.0
Trading Conditions
3.1
1.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$50K
2 Steps
they falsely accused of CID VOILATION ( my device is used to access other traders account which i didnt do ) when i saked for the proof the denied to give ay proof and said this is final decision.
N/A
0
nothing
1.0
User Friendliness
1.0
Payout Process
1.0
Customer Care
1.0
Trading Conditions
Reason
Breach Reason
cid voilation
Summary
they falsely accused of CID VOILATION ( my device is used to access other traders account which i didnt do ) when i saked for the proof the denied to give ay proof and said this is final decision.
Documents From Reporter
3.1
5.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$10K
1 Step
Competitive pricing, no time limits on challenges, and permission for news trading. they are also best customer handling. Regarding payout process i didnt get until payout.
N/A
0
Customer handling
They have best leverage
5.0
User Friendliness
5.0
Payout Process
5.0
Customer Care
5.0
Trading Conditions
3.1
4.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$10K
2 Steps
Its a good prop firm for beginners and pro traders in the whole world, and I love it so muchhhhhhhhh, and I love the rules of the company and I want the best
N/A
0
prix
prix
4.0
User Friendliness
4.0
Payout Process
5.0
Customer Care
5.0
Trading Conditions
3.1
9
total reviews
5
2
4
3
3
1
2
0
1
3
Less than
20 reviews
20% off all accounts — first order only
Less than
20 reviews
20% off all accounts — first order only
