FundingPips Prop Firm Reviews

: You must have traded with the firm for at least 2-weeks before leaving a review. Giveaway winners cannot leave a review if still in the challenge phase. Editing Review. If you are editing a previous review, your new review will replace the original once it has been verified. Ensure you have read our Submission Guidelines to make your review process smooth.

Extremely disappointing experience with FundingPips. I purchased a 1-Step account on May 10, 2026, intending to use EAs on my own dedicated VPS. After my purchase, FundingPips significantly changed its VPN/VPS rules, and their support gave me contradictory answers about whether a legitimate dedicated VPS was allowed. I was then told the new restrictions also applied to existing accounts. When I requested a refund because these changes directly affected how I intended to use the service, my request was denied. Even worse, shortly after requesting the refund, my account was banned. Changing important rules after a purchase, providing inconsistent information, refusing a refund, and then banning a customer shortly after they request one is completely unacceptable. Based on my experience, I have completely lost trust in FundingPips and cannot recommend them.

nice prop firm nice platform rules is fine A wide selection of challenges Fair laws Overall experience at fundingpips was great, customer support and user dashboard are top notch, I took a 2 step challenge where the rules were clear.

I was a client of this prop firm for about a year, and overall my experience was positive. The spreads were good, order execution was solid, and communication with support was professional. I successfully passed the evaluation and received a $50,000 live account. Recently, however, the firm introduced a new rule for existing two-phase accounts: a maximum of 2% risk per trade. At first glance, this sounds like a good risk management rule. In practice, though, it means that if your loss on a single trade exceeds around 1.2% because of slippage, your account can be terminated. In today’s markets, where unexpected news can move prices instantly, this creates a serious problem. A headline from someone like Trump or any other major market-moving event can cause significant slippage, meaning your stop loss may not be filled where you expected. Unfortunately, that’s exactly what happened to me. My planned risk was within the limit, but the market moved so quickly that the actual loss exceeded it, and my account was closed. I understand why the company introduced this rule—it’s a business decision, and they have the right to manage their risk. However, applying such a significant rule change to already existing accounts has greatly reduced my confidence in the firm. It also raises an important question: what guarantees are there that similar rule changes won’t be introduced later for other account types, such as Flex accounts? Because of this, I don’t plan to purchase any more accounts here while there are other prop firms with more stable and predictable policies. It’s disappointing because my experience had been positive until this change. Based on my experience, I cannot recommend spending your time or money here if you have access to other established prop firms with more consistent rules.

This will going to be my alternative to 5ers since they are encountering various issues and delays right now. Glad that FundingPips has set the bar for a trusted firm

I am submitting this review/dispute because FundingPips banned my funded Master account for an alleged device ID change/device sharing breach, despite the fact that their support had previously confirmed in writing that my VPS with static IP setup was compliant under their VPS policy exception. The timeline is the main issue. I used the same VPS/static IP setup across Phase 1, Phase 2, and the Master account. Before placing trades on the Master account, I asked FundingPips support about this setup and received written confirmation that it was acceptable. My last trading activity on the Master account was on 29 June, with only 4 trades total. I had no trading activity after that because I was traveling. The ban email arrived on 8 July, more than a week after the last trade. FundingPips has not explained how a device sharing breach supposedly occurred during a period when the account was inactive. I asked support what exactly triggered the decision, but I was not provided logs, screenshots, device details, linked account details, or any concrete evidence. Two support agents repeated that the decision from the responsible trading team was final, without addressing the prior VPS approval or the timeline. I can provide supporting documents, including the chat where the VPS/static IP setup was approved, the ban email showing the date and stated reason, trade/account history showing the last activity date, and support chats where I asked for clarification. I believe the ban was unreasonable and not transparently justified based on the information provided to me.

they falsely accused of CID VOILATION ( my device is used to access other traders account which i didnt do ) when i saked for the proof the denied to give ay proof and said this is final decision.

Overall experience at fundingpips was great, customer support and user dashboard are top notch, I took a 2 step challenge where the rules were clear, and and confusion was sorted really quickly by the support. Looking forward to dealing with fundingpips on the coming days.

Competitive pricing, no time limits on challenges, and permission for news trading. they are also best customer handling. Regarding payout process i didnt get until payout.

Its a good prop firm for beginners and pro traders in the whole world, and I love it so muchhhhhhhhh, and I love the rules of the company and I want the best