Blueberry FuturesvsLucid Trading

Blueberry Futures and Lucid Trading both offer a 90% profit split, so the real differentiators come down to cost, capital, and rules. Blueberry Futures charges $184 and funds up to $900,000, while Lucid Trading charges $140 and funds up to $750,000. Blueberry Futures uses a 1-step evaluation; Lucid Trading uses 1 steps.

Lucid Trading's challenge fee of $140 is lower than Blueberry Futures's $184, making it the lower-cost option for traders focused on upfront fees.

Both Blueberry Futures and Lucid Trading offer a 90% profit split, so there is no meaningful difference in how profits are shared. Other factors—such as payout frequency, scaling plans, and maximum allocation—are likely to have a greater impact on your decision.

Blueberry Futures offers a maximum allocation of $900,000, compared with Lucid Trading's $750,000. Traders looking to manage larger amounts of capital may prefer Blueberry Futures.

Both firms use a 1-step evaluation. Blueberry Futures requires 1 minimum trading days per phase, while Lucid Trading requires 2. Blueberry Futures provides greater scheduling flexibility.

Drawdown information is unavailable for both Blueberry Futures and Lucid Trading.

Blueberry Futures pays out every 5 days, while Lucid Trading pays out every 5 days.

Both firms have the same payout frequency, so there is no meaningful difference in how often you can request payouts.

Lucid Trading offers a scaling plan, while Blueberry Futures does not. If increasing your funded capital over time is important, Lucid Trading has an advantage.

Lucid Trading leads on both rating (5) and review volume (9), making it the stronger customer satisfaction signal. Blueberry Futures has a 0 rating from 0 reviews.