FundedNext FuturesvsLucid Trading

The headline difference is profit split — FundedNext Futures offers 80% while Lucid Trading offers 90%. Beyond that, FundedNext Futures charges $134 with a max allocation of $750,000, compared to Lucid Trading's $140 and $750,000.

FundedNext Futures's challenge fee of $134 is lower than Lucid Trading's $140, making it the lower-cost option for traders focused on upfront fees.

Lucid Trading offers a 90% profit split, compared with FundedNext Futures's 80%. The 10 percentage point difference can become meaningful as trading profits increase.

Both FundedNext Futures and Lucid Trading offer a maximum allocation of $750,000. Other factors—such as scaling plans, payout frequency, and evaluation rules—are likely to have a greater impact on your decision.

Both firms use a 1-step evaluation. Lucid Trading requires at least 2 trading days per phase, while FundedNext Futures has no minimum trading day requirement, allowing faster progression if performance targets are met.

Drawdown information is unavailable for both FundedNext Futures and Lucid Trading.

FundedNext Futures pays out every 5 days, while Lucid Trading pays out every 5 days.

Both firms have the same payout frequency, so there is no meaningful difference in how often you can request payouts.

Lucid Trading offers a scaling plan, while FundedNext Futures does not. If increasing your funded capital over time is important, Lucid Trading has an advantage.

Lucid Trading leads on both rating (5) and review volume (9), making it the stronger customer satisfaction signal. FundedNext Futures has a 4.8 rating from 9 reviews.