Blue Guardian FuturesvsLucid Trading

Blue Guardian Futures and Lucid Trading both offer a 90% profit split, so the real differentiators come down to cost, capital, and rules. Blue Guardian Futures charges $140 and funds up to $750,000, while Lucid Trading charges $140 and funds up to $750,000. Blue Guardian Futures uses a 1-step evaluation; Lucid Trading uses 1 steps.

Both Blue Guardian Futures and Lucid Trading charge the same challenge fee of $140. With identical upfront costs, other factors such as allocation size, evaluation rules, and payout terms become more important.

Both Blue Guardian Futures and Lucid Trading offer a 90% profit split, so there is no meaningful difference in how profits are shared. Other factors—such as payout frequency, scaling plans, and maximum allocation—are likely to have a greater impact on your decision.

Both Blue Guardian Futures and Lucid Trading offer a maximum allocation of $750,000. Other factors—such as scaling plans, payout frequency, and evaluation rules—are likely to have a greater impact on your decision.

Both firms use a 1-step evaluation. Lucid Trading requires at least 2 trading days per phase, while Blue Guardian Futures has no minimum trading day requirement, allowing faster progression if performance targets are met.

Drawdown information is unavailable for both Blue Guardian Futures and Lucid Trading.

Blue Guardian Futures pays out every 5 days, while Lucid Trading pays out every 5 days.

Both firms have the same payout frequency, so there is no meaningful difference in how often you can request payouts.

Both Blue Guardian Futures and Lucid Trading offer a scaling plan, allowing funded traders to increase their account allocation over time by meeting performance targets.

Lucid Trading leads on both rating (5) and review volume (9), making it the stronger customer satisfaction signal. Blue Guardian Futures has a 4 rating from 1 reviews.